Challenges: CO2 Fertilization, Alterations to Hydrology, Rising Average Temperature & Shifting Habitat Ranges, Extreme Weather Events, Pests & Diseases, Sea Level Rise, Ocean Acidification
Adaptations: Forecasting, Genetic Adaptation, A Diversified and Just Global Food Economy
Whether it be the crops we grow, the
livestock we raise, or the wild plants and
animals that we harvest, every organism
that we rely on as a food source depends
on a unique confluence of conditions
that determine whether it will merely
survive, deteriorate, or flourish. These
environmental factors can include such
things as: access to water and nutrients,
temperature, the amount and periodicity
of sunlight, and interactions with other
organisms within the same ecosystem.
For thousands of years, each of these individual factors has tended to change only slowly or infrequently. Encouraged by this predictability, people have been able to build civilizations around specific food sources. Over time, their sustained and focused attention has led to the great advances in the science and technology of food production that allow humanity to sustain a rapidly growing population.
Now, however, that progress may be
coming undone. The accumulation of
greenhouse gasses threatens to simultaneously,
and in unpredictable and potentially
dramatic ways, alter nearly every
variable with an input into the grand
equation that is our food production system.
Because the timing and magnitude
of any one of these changes is hard to
forecast, and especially because each
individual variable is involved in innumerable
and complex interactions, it is
nearly impossible to predict, on a large
scale, just how our agriculture, livestock,
and fisheries will respond to the new
climate conditions we have created for
ourselves. However, by inspecting the
following individual effects, a clearer
picture may begin to emerge:
CO2 Fertilization to top
Higher concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide allow plants to grow faster and larger. From a food production standpoint, this is generally good news. Yields should increase, less fertilizer may be needed, and faster growing crops can open new, previously marginal, lands to agriculture. However, not all the effects of carbon dioxide fertilization will prove beneficial. For instance, the magnitude of the CO2 fertilization effect is different for different types of plant species. Among those that will benefit the most are many weed species, triggering concerns from farmers about competition in their fields and from environmentalists about greater use of herbicides. Plants growing under heightened CO2 conditions can exhibit abnormal characteristics with regard to the way they absorb and process nutrients. Also, CO2 fertilization can sometimes cause plants to speed through the growth phase in which they generate their harvestable grains, fruits or vegetable matter. As a result, fields filled with more outright biomass may, at the same time, produce diminished and less nutritious harvests.
Alterations to Hydrology to top
Global warming is certain to produce
changes in the way water cycles through
our oceans, into the atmosphere and
over the land. As rising heat drives
accelerated evaporation, land and crops
growing on them will potentially dry
out faster. However, at the same time,
more moisture will be drawn from the
oceans, causing overall precipitation to
increase. Rarely will changes in these
countervailing forces simply offset each
other to preserve the status quo. Much
more frequently, specific localities and
the food resources supported there will
face new trends in water availability.
Areas that currently derive water from
melting glaciers and snow-pack are
likely to see some dramatic changes as
well. Himalayan glaciers, for instance,
which now provide the majority of nonmonsoon
water flow for some of Asia’s
most important agricultural regions, are
in danger of shrinking or even disappearing
completely as a result of global
warming. In other areas, where an
annual snow-pack serves as an important
water resource, rising temperatures
will alter the yearly precipitation timing
and mix. For instance, in the American
West, diminished snow pack and earlier,
faster melts are likely to leave many
areas regularly facing late summer
droughts and an increased incidence of
forest fires.
Low water availability and abnormally timed flows disrupt more than agricultural irrigation. They can disrupt travel along the rivers and canals that play a large role in low-cost food transportation, diminish our ability to carry out inland aquaculture, and devastate fisheries (such as salmon) that rely on freshwater rivers for spawning.
Rising Average Temperatures & Shifting Habitat Ranges to top
As global warming increases the baseline temperature at most locations on our planet, those organisms or populations that are free to move in order to remain in their ideal temperature range, will. At the global level, this will produce mixed effects. Some food producers, especially those at higher latitudes and altitudes, may welcome the opportunity to grow, raise, and harvest plants and animals in areas formerly too cool for that activity. Those in temperate climate zones will be forced to adopt new practices better suited to a more tropical environement. Still others, especially those in the newly superheated tropics, will face an unprecedented climate zone, for which no food producing species have had time to evolve.
On the whole, this phenomenon of
range shifting can pose a real danger to
fisheries, livestock, and agriculture. To
begin with, temperature-induced range
changes may push populations into
new areas for which they are otherwise
poorly adapted. It may render obsolete
local cultures, economies, and infrastructure
that had been uniquely shaped
around specific food resources Global
biodiversity will dwindle as some high
altitude and polar climates simply cease
to exist. Most menacing of all is the
fact that these climate zone shifts are
not monolithic, orderly processes that
will affect all members of an ecosystem simultaneously. Some species will shift
more readily and quickly, while others
may experience almost no range shift.
This uneven movement of ranges will
decouple intricately choreographed
intra-species relationships that have
developed through thousands, if not
millions, of years of co-evolution. The
range, migration habits, and life cycles
between pollinators and plants, pests
and their prey, and wild food-stocks and
their predators, will all be affected. It
is unlikely that these environmental services
can be replaced by human means.
Extreme Weather Events to top
In
general, agricultural producers will face
less stress from extreme cold events and
freezes but higher stress from more frequent
and more intense heat waves. As
heat energy accumulates in our atmosphere
and oceans it may produce more
frequent and powerful storms (including,
but not limited to, hurricanes) along
with the tornadoes, hail, lightning,
high winds, and flooding that they can
bring. Each can damage crops, kill or
stress livestock, and disrupt or destroy
both natural resources and necessary
infrastructure.
Parasites, Diseases, Fungi & Other Pests to top
These organisms can
harm, poison, eat, or otherwise reduce
the yield of the species we use as food.
All tend to thrive and spread more rapaciously
in warmer and more humid climates.
Furthermore, as fewer and fewer
regions get cold enough for long enough
to produce a winter kill-off, populations
of these organisms can explode. Keeping
them in check will require the use
of even more fungicides and insecticides
for crops and antibiotics in livestock
production and aquaculture.
Sea Level Rise to top
Global warming is causing ocean levels to rise and is therefore rendering agricultural areas, such as low-lying, but usually very fertile river deltas, and brackish estuaries, which often serve as critical nurseries for commercial fish species, increasingly susceptible to saltwater intrusion and inundation.
Ocean Acidification to top
Atmospheric carbon dioxide has always naturally dissolved into our oceans. Now, however, the rate at which this is happening is increasing and, as a result, the ocean is becoming more acidic. Under these conditions it is more difficult for sea creatures to develop and maintain their calcium based shells and exoskeletons. As a result, populations of certain species used directly as food sources ( such as mollusks and clams) and others that form the foundations of important marine structures and food chains (like corals and some plankton species) will experience stress and could eventually even collapse.
Adaptations to top
In the face of these challenges, people
around the world must begin to make
critical adaptations to our global food
production system. Some key areas
include:
Forecasting to top
It is important
that we develop capacities to better
understand global climate trends and
extrapolate from them more localized,
near-term weather forecasts that can
then be used in order to prepare for the
coming changes. The accomplishment
of this task will require policies and
investments that allow for better integration
of, and access to, data sets related
to climate change and weather. Multidisciplinary
response programs should
be instituted to make sure that ranchers,
farmers, and breeders have a reasonably
accurate understanding of upcoming
conditions. At the same time financial
experts and policy makers need to make
sure food producers have the ability to
make changes accordingly.
Genetic Adaptation to top
Once future conditions can be forecasted, scientists can begin to breed, or even genetically engineer, our food sources to have characteristics that make them better suited to their environment. This process, carried out through selective breeding is nothing new and has served humanity well throughout history. Now however, the speed of environmental changes is outpacing our capacity to breed new characteristics through traditional methods. Some see genetic engineering as the answer. Through the use of advanced technology, we can now implant (even from completely different species) the genetic code associated with a desirable genotype directly into a food species.
While this technology holds great
promise, it is not without its drawbacks.
Chief among them is the concern that
genetically modified organisms willinterbreed with and therefore “pollute”
or reduce the diversity in a species’s
gene pool. Doing so would limit the
variety of traits exhibited by a species
and therefore also limit the pool from
which desirable traits can be identified
and propagated. Special attention must
also be given to preserving a wide and
diverse gene pool against the threats to
biodiversity posed by habitat loss and a
growing propensity toward widespread
monocropping. Monocropping (a practice
in which entire farms or even whole
regions of a country are planted with
nearly identical seed) may be unwise in
the uncertain times that lie ahead. Less
genetic variation in our food-stocks
means that an increasing percentage of
any year’s harvest could be wiped-out by
a single common threat. Policies should
be derived to incentivise, as a form of
food security insurance, the cultivation
of more genetically diverse crops even
if, individually, they may prove to be
less productive.
A Diversified, Adaptable, and
Just Global Food Economy to top
In
almost every way, the expected distribution
of positive and negative climate
change effects has the appearance of
being unfair. As we have read, climate
change, at least in the short and medium
time frame, may produce positive as
well as negative effects. However, these
effects are not equally distributed. The
preponderance of those beneficial effects
will occur in higher latitudes, mostly in
well-developed Northern Hemisphere
countries -- the same ones, incidentally,
that have historically played the biggest
role in emitting the greenhouse gasses
that are now causing climate change. By
contrast, equatorial regions, populated
by less developed countries that not only
have the least ability to respond to these
challenges, but also are responsible
for only a small percentage of historic
greenhouse gas emissions, are the most
likely to bear the burden of the negative
effects of climate change.
In any instance where food is made
scarce or prohibitively expensive, and
especially in cases where there is some
perceived injustice at play, border-crossing
problems like political instability,
forced migrations, widespread health
emergencies, collapsed markets, and war
can quickly follow. To head off these
types of scenarios, the international
community must help to bolster stable,
responsive governments, an informed
and interlinked scientific community,
adequate access to capital, and suitable
infrastructure for all. These improvements
are not only positive in their own
right, but also required in any region that
hopes to successfully cope with climate
change.
Regardless of whether this situation is viewed from the perspective of social justice or simple practicality, our global economic and political systems should recognize this phenomenon and take action to ensure a more equitable distribution of risks and rewards in our world-wide food production system.
Climate Change & Food Security
A Message from the President: Fishes, Loaves and Foresight
Reducing Our Food's Impact on Climate Change
Focus: Moving Down the Food Chain
Case Study: Agriculture in Thailand
The Biofuel Debate: Food vs. Energy?
|
Join the Climate Institute e-news mailing list: |
© 2007 - 2010 Climate Institute All Rights Reserved |
900 17th St. NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20006 Phone: +1-202-552-4723 Fax: +1-202-737-6410 info@climate.org |