from Climate Alert Volume 10, No. 3 July-August 1997

BP Chief Asserts Business Must Take Some Responsibility for
Climate Policy; Company Plans to Measure and Limit its
Greenhouse Gases

We can now see ...what we need to do to respond to the challenge of climate change. The key word is "we." .... Now, increasingly, the world has recognized the sense of taking precautionary action .... [a]ction for Government, and industry and consumers working together and in parallel.... I think the issue can be managed without disrupting economic development.... If we fail... the danger of disruption at some later point becomes a serious risk.

The science of climate change is still provisional. Perhaps all science is provisional. But it would be unwise and potentially dangerous to ignore the mounting concern. We need to take precautionary action now.

Developing the right policies ... will be a complex process ... not solved by denying or restricting the economic expectations of the people of Asia, or Africa or Latin America. Nor will it be resolved by destroying the living standards of the world's developing economies....

What is at stake is economic activity as a whole, not simply the transportation section. Of all the carbon emissions which result from human activity, only 20 percent comes from the transportation sector.

Politicians represent people, and they must define policy.... But business has a responsibility to help the process of defining the means by which that policy can be achieved. The problem of climate change will not be resolved at any single summit meeting.... It will take time .... What matters now is that we begin to take rational, precautionary steps, not wait for a finished, polished solution which has unanimous endorsement. Kyoto is an important meeting, but it is just one more step in a continuing process. I hope that some measure of agreement will be reached, and that it will lead to the involvement of the whole world....

Any agreement seems most likely to be around objectives and aspirations rather than around a detailed program. There may be a target.... but it will just be the beginning of the next process &emdash; development of

the means to achieve that target. Different governments ... will work in different ways to achieve their own targets using instruments which match local circumstances and political realities.

The three policy instruments ... likely to be taken up ... are taxation, carbon trading and joint implementation; each uses the market to change behavior.... The key lies in the detailed design of the instruments and ... the establishment of the right incentives for action.

Taxation. The test of any proposed tax ... should be its actual impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, ... not simply a politically convenient means of raising revenue. ... To be effective, taxation... would have to cover all industry sectors, ... based on a level playing field between fuels, ... set at a rate which actually changed behavior, reduc[ing] emissions by changing the fuel mix or using improved technology.

Trading permits put a value on carbon emissions and establish a ... market [where they can be] bought and sold at competitive ... prices. The playing field must be level. On a macro-scale, industries would reduce emission levels according to the supply of permits in the market. On a micro-scale, companies would be encouraged to seek new technologies....

Joint implementation [does] the most effective things in the places where they have the greatest impact, ... improving competitiveness through technical progress and controlling some of the more immediate environmental problems such as inner city pollution.

The right incentives would produce a more rapid turnover of capital stock which could be enormously beneficial because so many emissions and so much pollution come from the oldest plant. The right incentives could also encourage ... sequestration and the capture, reinjection and storage of CO2. Reforestation is also an attractive way of mitigating ... part of the impact of CO2 emissions.

Climate change is a matter for public policy .... But business can't be passive in the process. We must be alive to our own responsibilities. We can't solve the whole problem, but we can make a contribution.....

Four months ago, I set out our objectives in this area:

1) supporting scientific research and contributing to the public policy debate

2) playing our part in joint implementation initiatives

3) investing in renewable energy, particularly in photovoltaics &emdash; that is, solar power

4) and controlling our own emissions of CO2.

In terms of public policy, we've developed a set of principles which we're publishing today.... We've also made some important steps within the company. The one I emphasized earlier ... at Stanford ... is our commitment to solar power.... The trends in photovoltaics are very encouraging &emdash; but there are still large obstacles: the acceptability to consumer, determin[ing] whether we can achieve economies of scale in production; the technology [improvements] to bring down costs.... By 2020 we believe up to 5 percent of world energy could be supplied by renewable energies, including solar power. Within 50 years it could be as much as half &emdash; figures also ... given by John Jennings, former head of Shell Transport and Trading, ... one of the most experienced people in the energy industry.... Given the current economics, solar won't replace oil and gas as the prime source of energy in the lifetime of anyone in this room. Oil and gas will be required to meet the world's energy needs. That is why we continue to explore and develop new resources, ensuring they are used with maximum efficiency ... and minimum of emissions.... We are setting our own targets to measure and report the volumes of CO2 emitted from our own operations,... [which will be] independently verified and published. We are developing our own internal emissions trading system.

No single company or country can solve the problem of climate change.... But I hope we can make a difference ... by showing what is possible through constructive action. There is no immediate crisis, and so long as we take precautionary action, ... [with] a common end, but a diversity of means .... there will be no crisis in the future.

 

Article List | back: Wind Energy | proceed: Fuel Cell Autos

1785 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20036
 Phone 1.202.547-0104       FAX 1.202.547.0111
Email us